20221001

Isaac Ambrose Part 2

Puritan contemplative
In a “contemplative biography” Schwanda helpfully examines extant diary entries. He quotes a stand out experience
May 20, 1641. (pm) The Lord in his mercy poured into my soul the ravishing joy of his blessed Spirit. O how sweet was the Lord unto me? I never felt such a lovely taste of heaven before: I believed this was the joyful sound, the kisses of his mouth, the sweetnesses of Christ, the joy of his Spirit, the new wine of his kingdom; it continued with me about two days.
Schwanda notes “a number of significant themes from this two day encounter” - specific mention of experiencing each member of the Trinity; joy (mentioned three times) as the dominant affection and sweetness (mentioned twice). Ambrose traced the experience to the time in which he “began to see spiritual things … upon which followed more desire and endeavours after grace.”(1)
Another example
May 17, 1648. At several times I ran through the duties of watchfulness, self-examination, experiences, meditation, the life of faith; and many a time I felt many sweet stirrings of Christ's Spirit; the Lord Jesus appeared to my soul, gave me the kisses of his mouth, especially in my prayers to, and praises of his Majesty. Surely thou art my Lord, and I will praise thee; Thou art my God, and I will exalt thee. Hallelujah! (2)
Two days later, he writes, summing up the variety of experience he knew,
One felt many strivings, and contrary workings in his spirit; sometimes in prayer ravished, and sometimes heavy; sometimes full of comfort and sometimes exceedingly dejected; sometimes patient and other whiles impatient. O the fickleness and uncertainty of the heart in the course of piety.
Spiritual warfare is a big theme in Puritan writing and it comes out in Ambrose
May 25, 1646. The Lord opened a poor creature's eye, to see in some measure the depths of Satan, and deceitfulness of his own heart: he acted in things doubtful, against the reluctancy of his own conscience before; no question this is sin, because it is not faith.
He also reports how Satan tempted his troubled soul, while sleeping, but
March 6, 1647. The Lord stood by him, put prayers into him though asleep, whereby he overcame the temptation; then awaking, he deeply apprehended Satan's approach and busy temptations: it struck him into fears but praising God for his assistance, he received boldness, and then slept again. (3)
There was plenty of opposition from world and flesh too. On Monday, January 24, 1648, he “had a grieved and troubled heart, by reason of some opposition of wicked people.” Elsewhere he says
many and many a time I have been on the wing, yea, sometimes the opposition has been so strong, that I have wished with David, Oh that I had the wings of a dove, for then I would flee and be at rest. (5)
The Media refers to “our special sins, our Dalilah sins”. Schwanda suggests Ambrose's was pride. “His primary conflict appears to have been his desire to create a better public image than was justified”. In support, two May 1646 entries.
13. One performed indeed a good action, but he exceedingly over prized it; which he found afterwards.
15. This day a poor soul, upon strict examination of his heart, found that formerly he had judged many sinful actions lawful and good and had excused many actions though in themselves sinful. He felt not such a powerful operation of his corruptions before and so through pride and ignorance thought better of himself than he had cause. (6)
Doubt was another temptation.
May 20, 1651. (am) I fell on reading the word, perused the directions and then searched into the common places and uses of my corruptions in nature and practice; of my comforts against the burthens of my daily infirmities; of establishing my heart against the fear of falling away; of directions in my calling; of comforts against outward crosses; of my privileges in Christ above all the wicked in the world: in every of these Christ appeared in some measure suitably to my soul. (pm) I proceeded in the common places and uses of sweet passages that melted my heart; of sensible comforts, and of places hard to be understood: in the first my heart was sweetly melted, in the second cheered; in the conclusion the Lord struck me with a reverence of his majesty and presence, filled my soul with spiritual refreshings, enlarged my heart with praises of him and desires to live unto him who hath given me in this time of love so many visits and kisses of his mouth. Hallelujah! (7)
The day before he had written
19. (am) I exercised the life of faith, when the Lord strengthened me to act faith on several promises, both temporal, spiritual, and eternal; I had then sweet, refreshing, and encouraging impressions on my soul against all the fearful, sinful, and doubtful dreams I had the night or two before dreamed. (pm) I considered the duty of prayer, observed some workings of God's Spirit in my perusing the rules, and afterwards in the practice of this duty. Blessed be God! (8)
Anger was a sin he fell into. He records how one Saturday evening (January 23, 1647) he “fell into exorbitancy of passion”. He was so angry he had heart palpitations. We do not know who he was angry with. His wife? Thankfully, the next day he is able to report that his conscience was troubled “for his rash anger” and that he “reconciled himself to his adversary, and immediately God spake peace to his conscience.”
He also guarded his heart against covetousness. On February 27, 1645, he had a pay rise and prayed “incline my heart unto thy testimonies and not to covetousness.” On March 27, 1647, he confesses himself “a poor soul being mightily ensnared with the world and finding by experience its vanity and vexation, he resolved against it.” He also speaks of being “exceedingly troubled by the cares of this life.” Later that same year, December 11, he writes positively
This day one observed God's goodness, in supplying fully all his temporal wants. This he construed as earnest both of spiritual and eternal favours and mercies in Christ. (9)
Footnotes                                                                          

1. Schwanda 236, 237
2. Schwanda 114 Again the Media pattern
3. Schwanda 121
4. Schwanda 126
5. Fishwick 166
6. Schwanda 128
7. Schwanda 162
8. Ambrose, Media (1657) 89
9. Schwanda 128, 129

Isaac Ambrose Part 1


This is the opening of my paper given at thet Westminster Conference, in 2013. The papers were published under the title
Clairty and Confusion.
We begin back in May, 1651. The Wars of the three kingdoms are drawing to a close and Cromwell is heading back to London, his Scottish campaign completed.
We focus on a small wooden hut in an extensive wood somewhere in the north of England. (1) In the hut is the man we want to consider, Isaac Ambrose. At this time he is about 46. He wears the dark clothing typical of a Christian minister of the time. Fairly slight in build, he is a little taller perhaps than the average for the day (5' 6”). His hair touches his collar and on his head he wears a dark skull cap. His greying beard is small and neat, occupying his chin with a thin line above his upper lip. His look is sober and serious but a kindliness in his eyes suggests he is an approachable man. (2)
Sometimes he speaks aloud, sometimes not. He has a book with him and a means of writing. What is he doing? He is praying and meditating according to a method he share in his work Media. We know some of the things that he wrote at such times because, while his “register of God's dealing towards him and of his dealings towards God” (3) has not survived, he preserved sample extracts in Media (4)
Ambrose felt that personal experiences with God can be shared with others to encourage them.
The Christian that hath collected experiences, or found out methods, for the advancement of holiness, must not deny such knowledge to the body; Christians must drive an open and free trade, they must teach one another the mystery of godliness … would Christians thus meet and exchange words and notions, they might build up one another, they might heat and inflame one another, they might strengthen and encourage one another, as the brethren did Paul: and have we not an express command for this duty of conference? (5)
In a subsequent edition he varied and reduced the extracts but if we use all editions, there are a significant number of entries to consider. (6)
In 1842 Joseph Hunter wrote of “a pathos and beauty in some of the passages ... which make one wish for more”. (7) Ambrose made much of Canticles 2:11, 12 Come, my beloved, let us go forth into the field, etc, there will I give thee my loves and quotes a favourite writer, Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153), “The bridegroom of our souls is bashful, and more frequently visits his bride in the solitary places.” (8)
Writing of Christ tempted in the wilderness, he says
In this respect, I know not but the wilderness might be an advantage to Christ’s design. In this solitary place he could not but breathe out more pure inspiration; heaven usually is more open and God usually more familiar and frequent in his visits in such places. I know not what others’ experiences may be but if I have found anything of God, or of his grace, I may thank a wood, a wilderness, a desert, a solitary place, for its accommodation and have I not a blessed pattern here before me? (9)
Wheaton academic Tom Schwanda has studied Ambrose extensively and wonders if he began “by following the practice of his biblical namesake” (Genesis 24:63). (10)
Over several days he makes these entries
14. In a pleasant wood and sweet walks in it, the Lord moved and enabled me to begin the exercise of secret duties and after the prolegomena, or duties in general, I fell on that duty of watchfulness. The Lord then gave me to observe my former negligence and to make some resolutions. I found the Lord sweet to me in the conclusion of the duty. Hallelujah!
15. (am) I fell on the duty of self-trial and ... confessed my sins before and since conversion, wherein the Lord sweetly melted my heart. (pm) I perused my diary for the last year, wherein are many passages of mercies from God, and troubles for sin, etc.
16. (am) I went through the duty of experiences, and felt some stirrings of God's Spirit in my soul. (pm) I fell on the duty of evidences, when I acted faith, and found my evidences clear. Oh how sweet was my God!
17. (am) I meditated on the love of Christ, wherein Christ appeared, and melted my heart in many sweet passages. (pm) I meditated on eternity of hell and on eternity of heaven, wherein the Lord both melted and cheered and warmed and refreshed my soul. Surely the touches of God's Spirit are as sensible as any outward touches. Hallelujah!
We have no record for some days but other entries follow
22. Occasionally, though not in course, I fell on some parts of the duty of self-denial: the Lord in mercy wrought in my soul some suitableness to that spiritual gospel-duty; Lord, keep this fire up in a flame still. Oh it is a sweet, but a very hard lesson.
31. I practised (as the Lord enabled) the duty of saints' sufferings; into which condition as I was cast, so the Lord gave me to see my sin and to bewail it and to pray for the contrary, grace and God's favour. The Lord was sweet to me in the preparations to, but especially in the improving of, sufferings. Now the Spirit left in my soul a sweet scent and savour behind ... (11)
Edmund Calamy tells us it was Ambrose's “usual custom once in a year, for the space of a month to retire into a little hut in a wood, and avoiding all human converse to devote himself to contemplation.”(12) Every May he would retire to woods near Hoghton Tower and the River Darwen near Preston or to Weddicre (Wood acre) Woods near Garstang and spend the month praying, meditating and seeking God.
The first retreat it appears was in May, 1641. A May 20, 1646 entry gives an example of the sort of framework followed and tells how he experienced God.
I came to Weddicre, which I did upon mature resolution, every year about that pleasant Spring time (if the Lord pleased) to retire myself and in some solitary and silent place to practice especially the secret duties of a Christian. In this place are sweet silent woods and therein this month, and part of the next, the Lord by his Spirit wrought in me evangelical repentance for sin, gave me sweet comforts and spiritual refreshings in my commerce and intercourse with him, by prayer and meditation and self examination, and discovered to me the causes of my many troubles and discouragements in my ministry, whereupon I prayed more fervently, pressed the Lord with his promises, set his power and wisdom and mercy on work; and so waited and believed, till the Lord answered every petition and I could not but observe his hand in it. This was a comfortable time to my soul. (13)
Schwanda says his practice was unusual, especially for a married man with children though it was perhaps more common then for men to be away from home for long periods. (14)
Footnotes                                                                          
Preston Chronicle July 23, 1836 “on the very spot (as nearly as can be ascertained) in Woodacre Wood on which” the “hut was built, and in which, during his ministry in Garstang for the space of one month in a year [Ambrose] spent the life of a recluse in fasting and in prayer, Mr Thomas Smith, of Scorton, the Duke of Hamilton's gamekeeper, has built another, and on Saturday last, at Mr Smith's expense, 49 children, besides ladies and gentlemen, took tea in this newly-erected cabin.” Cf Anthony Hewitson, Northward, historic, topographic and residential gleaning 68 kindly supplied with other articles by Mr Roy Middleton.
See National Portrait Gallery anonymous line engraving (1674) and an earlier engraving.
3 Henry Fishwick, History of the Parish of Garstang, etc 164
4 Puritans often had their diaries destroyed at death.
5 Prima, Media & Ultima 1737 ed 200. All spellings and punctuation updated.
6 Tom Schwanda, PhD Soul Recreation: Spiritual Marriage and Ravishment in the Contemplative-Mystical Piety of Isaac Ambrose (published as Soul Recreation: the Contemplative-Mystical Piety of Puritanism) 135. Entries vary over the editions with 1650 containing the most; the last two identical. The May 1651 entries are replaced by shorter, alternatives. He also greatly reduced examples in his experiences section as not all previous material was edifying.
7 Joseph Hunter, Rise of the old dissent, exemplified in ... Oliver Heywood, preface
8 1648. Cf Canticles Sermon XXXI. Schwanda 181 “Ambrose in particular, and the Puritans in general, were often indebted to Bernard”. Joseph Hall was an influence (Schwanda). Ambrose lists Angier, Ash, Ball, Baxter, Bolton, Burgess, Burroughs, Byfield, Downham, Dyke, Goodwin, Gouge, Hooker, Leigh, Mason, Rogers, Torshell, White.
9 Looking Unto Jesus: A View of the Everlasting Gospel, etc 1832 ed 235
10 KJV And Isaac went out to meditate in the field .... Schwanda 135
11 Prima, Media, etc 49, 50 He follows the order in Media - watchfulness, self-trial, self-denial, experiences, evidences, meditation, etc though he has self-denial after meditation. In 1651 May 14 was the Lord's Day.
12 Edmund Calamy, An account of the ministers, etc who were ejected or silenced, etc Vol 2, 1713 ed 409
13 Ambrose, Media (1650) 74
14 In May, 1641 his daughter was six. Schwanda says Joseph Alleine (1634-68) did something similar for shorter periods, Mary Rich (1625-78) spent much time contemplating in her garden or “wilderness”, Thomas Shepard (1605-49) used his garden for meditation and Theodorus A Brakel (1608-69) had eight hour devotions.

20220816

Enjoying God for ever - Does God's Word provide us with insight as to what it will be like?


Enjoying God forever. Perhaps the first thing to say is that forever is a very long time and that it can be divided into at least three parts. I say that partly because in John 17:3 Jesus says to his Father Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. Once you come to know the Lord Jesus Christ then you have eternal life so whereas as Christians we might want to say 'I hope to have eternal life', we should be saying 'I have eternal life'. The first part of eternal life is now and so the first part of enjoying God for ever is enjoying God now. You have been talking about this already this week, I understand.

Intermediate State
But then there is eternal life beyond death and the grave. This can be divided into two parts. Theologians speak of the intermediate stat and the final state. The state that we enter into when we die is the state where we have no body. Our bodies, whether they are buried or cremated or whatever happens to them, remain here on earth but our souls or spirits leave our bodies to be with God. It is true that the Word of God doesn't provide us with very much insight into what this will be like, it does at least assure us of some four things.
  • When the Christian dies he is away from the body and at home with the Lord (2 Corinthians 5:8)
  • When the Christian dies it is gain. He is with Christ, which is better by far (Philippians 1:21-23)
  • When the Christian dies he enters Paradise - I think that is a fair assumption from what Jesus says to the dying thief in Luke 23:43
  • We can probably go a little further and say that it is to be before the throne of God in order to serve him day and night in his temple and to be sheltered with his presence. It is the end of hunger, thirst and suffering. Every tear will be dried. (Revelation 7:15-17)
It is still difficult to imagine life not in a body, of course, but clearly it is a good life, a happy life, a life in the immediate presence of the Saviour, Jesus Christ and so most desirable and easy to be enjoyed.

Final state
But then beyond the Christian life on earth and in the intermediate state, there is the final state, what will be in the end the state in which the Christian is for the longest. What insight does God's Word provide us with as to what this will actually be like?
Now here it is a little more difficult for at least two reasons.
Firstly, because we only have limited information. So, for example, in 1 Thessalonians 4:16, 17 it says For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
So, dead believers will be raised and live ones will be caught up in the air to be with the Lord forever. But have you ever thought about this? If Christ comes again when you are 90 years old will you carry on looking 90, a perfect 90 yes but 90 still. Or will you begin to look younger? And those who are raised up from the dead, what sort of age will they look? Will babies look like men and women or will they still look like babies?
And then, secondly, one of the obvious places to turn to learn about this subject is the Book of Revelation and we know that book is full of pictures and symbols. So, for example, in Revelation 21:21, describing the New Jerusalem, it says The twelve gates were twelve pearls, each gate made of a single pearl. The great street of the city was of gold, as pure as transparent glass. It is not likely that there are literally twelve gates each made of a single pearl nor that the streets of heaven are literally paved with gold, as pure as transparent glass. Presumably, the point is that the new heaven is a splendid place, where gold is considered so common and so unimpressive that they use it to pave the streets!
So we need to be careful how we understand what is said but we can still learn a number of things from Revelation and from 1 Corinthians 15, which is about the resurrection body.

1 Corinthians 15
From that chapter we learn certain things.
  • There is some sort of connection between our present bodies and our resurrection bodies but only to the extent that a seed resembles a plant. Our bodies are going to be transformed.
  • Whereas the body that is sown is perishable, the resurrection body is imperishable. Mortality gives way to immortality.
  • There is a change from dishonour to glory, weakness to power, from being a natural body to being raised a spiritual body, a body suitable for life in heaven. What exactly a spiritual body is we cannot be sure. There is some evidence that the risen Christ could enter locked rooms at will. Maybe that gives us an insight.
  • There is surely something to learn about the resurrection body from the body of Christ after he had risen. Just as we have borne the image of the earthly man, so shall we bear the image of the heavenly man.
Revelation 21, 22
At the end of the Book of Revelation John tells us he saw "a new heaven and a new earth," for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. He adds and there was no longer any sea. We all like being by the sea here in Aber but no sea in heaven. To understand that you need to remember that John was on the Island of Patmos surrounded by sea, cutting him off from Christian fellowship. The sea also often stands for turmoil and trouble. So that is the point - the end of that. It goes on - he saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. A bride dressed for her husband, the church ready for Christ the groom - another powerful picture. He also heard a loud voice from the throne saying, "Look! God's dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. God with us.
Once again it is stressed that for these people God will wipe every tear from their eyes. More There will be no more death ... mourning ... crying ... pain, for the old order of things has passed away.
One of the characteristics of this place is that everything will be new. This is a reason why it is so difficult to go beyond giving a general impression.
John says of New Jerusalem It shone with God's glory ... its brilliance was like that of a very precious jewel, like a jasper, clear as crystal. He then describes the great, high wall with 12 gates ... three on each side ... 12 angels at the gates and On the gates ... the names of the 12 tribes of Israel. The wall of the city had 12 foundations on each there was written the names of the 12 apostles of the Lamb and so on. Twelve is a perfect number and the city is a perfect cube made of all sorts of precious stones. This all has to be taken figuratively.
But then John says I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. He notes how it had no need for sun or moon as the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp. The nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their splendour into it. The city gates are never shut as there will be no night there. The glory and honour of the nations will be brought into it. Nothing impure will ever enter it, nor ... anyone who does what is shameful or deceitful, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life. Again, lots of symbolism but no Temple sounds real.
As you come into Chapter 22 the final things said are that the place has a river - the river of the water of life ... clear as crystal, flowing from God's throne the Lamb's throne down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing 12 crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations.
The curse is now gone and God reigns forever. and his servants serve him. They will see his face, it says and his name will be on their foreheads. ... And they will reign for ever and ever. So, serving yet ruling too. How that works out in practice is difficult to imagine exactly.
I often think it is a little like when as a child you try to imagine what it will be like when you are grown up - you have an idea of what it might be like but the reality only becomes clear when you are actually grown up. Perhaps it is something like the caterpillar and the butterfly. You know the story of the two caterpillars walking along who see a butterfly in the air and the the one caterpillar says to the other, "You'll never get me up in one of those things". Perhaps it is only when we are butterflies that we caterpillars will really understand what enjoying God forever is really all about.

This was prepared for a session with the prime time group on the final night of their meeting at the Aber Conference in 2022.

20220806

Deceptive charm, fleeting beauty and the noble woman of Proverbs 31


When my grandfather was 18 he saw Harry Houdini jump off Newport bridge, there near the castle. Houdini was best known as an escapologist but he also used to be able to tense himself and let people punch him without him flinching.
I mention it because I would guess that some of you are doing a sort of mental Houdini trick as I speak. I'm not talking about escapology but about riding a punch. You know Proverbs 31:10-31 and you know that it describes what, on the face of it, appears to be the perfect wife, what one writer (Alison Le Cornu) describes as “the epitome of every man's conjugal dreams”.
Perhaps you have been beaten up with this very passage in the past. Perhaps, you've beaten yourself up with it in the past. So you're sitting there, as some people do in the dentist's chair, thinking "this isn't going to be pleasant but once it's over I'll be okay for another six or twelve months".
Now let me begin with a word of encouragement. I have not come here this afternoon to beat anyone up. As can often be the case, I think this passage has been rather misunderstood and far from discouraging women, it should be a passage they (and men for that matter) turn to not only to be challenged but to be encouraged too.
I don't know if it has ever struck you but this does seem an odd way to end the Book of Proverbs. The ending doesn't seem to be what we might expect.
What it is is an acrostic poem. We don't know who the author is but whoever finally put Proverbs together has chosen to end with it. Acrostic poems have been popular in many cultures at different times and in the Bible we have as many as 14 examples (besides this one there is most famously Psalm 119 plus eight other psalms, Lamentations 1-4 and Nahum 2). The Hebrew pattern was to begin each successive stanza with a succeeding letter of the Hebrew alphabet, which has 22 letters.
The poem here apparently describes the ideal woman. “An omni-competent woman” with “no blemish other than her perceived perfection” according to the writer I just quoted (Alison Le Cornu). Surely an unusual choice of subject for such a conclusion! There has certainly been an emphasis on men in the book so far, with references chiefly to the son but also to the shepherd, the farmer, and other predominantly male preserves. Several potentially derogatory things are said about the distaff side. Think of the adulteress, the nagging wife and so on. This closing passage comes, perhaps, as a refreshingly different approach.
On the face of it, it is an idealised description of a well-to-do woman of ancient times. At first, it appears to be a guide for men looking for such a wife, or for women wanting to be all that they ought to be. It is common for evangelical commentators to take it that way.
I have not read these books but they do make me a bit nervous for your sakes. I don't know if you know any of them. There are

  • Susan Sikes' A Woman of Noble Character: Becoming A Proverbs 31 Woman in Today's Busy World
  • Tiffany Langford Becoming a Proverbs 31 Woman: A 21 Day Devotional for Her
  • Susan Nnanabu You - an Ideal Woman! Becoming the Proverbs 31 Wife and Mother
  • Becoming the Noble Woman by Anita Young - a study based on God's blueprint for the ideal woman as set forth in Proverbs 31.
  • The Noble Woman by Daunyae Harris This book is part of a 10 week Bible study where we breakdown 10 virtues found in the life of the Proverbs 31 woman. You will be challenged to evaluate every area of your life and undergo a complete internal makeover.

I'm sure such books have many good things in them but I have to say that the main purpose of these verses in Proverbs 31 is probably not to make women feel guilty about how much they need to improve as wives or mothers.
In Proverbs 1 and Proverbs 8 Wisdom is personified as a woman. Again, in 9:1-6 we have Wisdom as a welcoming hostess. In contrast, 9:13-18 introduces the woman Folly. There are various references to the adulteress in the book too and I think it is clear that they are there not only to counter physical adultery but also spiritual adultery too, when people are attracted to false teaching. Such warnings are found in Chapter 5 and 6:20-7:27.
In a similar way 31:10-31 teaches not only principles of feminine godliness, but also principles of wisdom that can be useful to all. Indeed, the main purpose of the passage, I would suggest, is to give a final, memorable picture of wisdom ‘at home’. Here we take up the invitation offered back in 9:4-6.
The scholar John H Stek has written that this final section
... constitutes a subtle return to the central theme of the book found in the opening speeches and forms with them an envelope around the book of instruction as a whole. Hence, it appears to be a recommendation to marry Lady Wisdom.
As for the deeper question of why wisdom (or its opposite) should be thought of in feminine terms I’d guess it has to do firstly with the fact that this book is framed in terms of a father speaking to his son.
Possibly, the idea that wisdom is often found where least expected is underlined but that sounds a little chauvinist I suppose. Maybe it has to do with the fact that women are usually physically weaker than men and so are more reliant on their native wit, the power of the mind and the subtle approach. We speak of feminine intuition, feminine wiles, etc. As a generalisation, it is fair to say that there is something more delicate, more gentle, quieter, more subtle, tender and thoughtful about the feminine approach as opposed to the often coarse, loud, rather gauche one that we associate with males!
The American teacher Greg Uttinger adds appropriately that
It is in their wives that godly men find or should find the clearest and the dearest personal representation of Jesus Christ.
If wives even approximate to the dignity, skill, energy and well-doing exhibited here in Proverbs 31 they will.
The wise woman is not an unusual character in the Old Testament, of course – Think of the wise woman of Tekoa (2 Sam 14), Abigail (1 Sam 25) and the woman from Abel Beth Maacah (2 Sam 20). They are obvious examples along with Rahab, Deborah, Samson's mother, Ruth and Esther, not forgetting Tamar and Bathsheba who display a measure of dignity and wisdom. Such women, like their counterparts today, epitomise what is described here.
We can divide what is said here about this ideal woman into three sections and we can speak about her desirability, her qualities and her glory.

1. Her desirability
Isabella wants to be popular with her friends and even a famous TV presenter one day. Jessica would be happier to get on in her present job and build up a healthy bank balance to put down on a house. Emily says that as long as she has her health and peace of mind that is enough for her.
Many people think that the great thing to have in this life is fame and popularity, wealth and success or health and peace. These are fine things in their own way but, as the Book of Proverbs sometimes reminds us, what we need more than any of these things is wisdom from on high.
Thousands of people in this country do the National Lottery week after week because they think that if they win the jackpot all their problems will be over. In fact, money solves very little. If you are a fool with a little, you will still be a fool when you have a lot. They won’t suddenly become wise (or happy) just because they have won millions – there is plenty of evidence for this. No, the great need is for wisdom.
At least three reasons are found here as to why wisdom is so attractive and desirable.
1. Her great rarity and innate worth (10)
She is worth far more than rubies (10). There are plenty of healthy people around in this world. In this country perhaps 90% are able bodied. There are plenty of rich people too. I am told that every 5,000th person in the UK is a millionaire! There is no shortage of famous people either, even if it is only of the 15 minute variety.
But how many wise people are there in this world? They seem to be so very few. Try to think of someone who is wise. Names do not immediately spring to mind. In civil government, in law, in medicine, in science, in the churches, there seem to be very few wise people. The thing we most need in every branch of learning and industry is the rarest asset of all.
Those of you who follow these things may know that back in 1986 when Prince Andrew married Sarah Ferguson he gave her a ruby ring, apparently because she was a redhead. The ring held a Burmese ruby that was then reported to be worth £25K. In today's terms that would be about £72K. Imagine that, a £72K ruby ring. But wisdom is worth far more than many such rubies!
2. Her power to provide complete confidence and everything of value (11)
Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value (11). Once you find wisdom and embrace her as your wife you can have complete confidence in her. Others may let you down but wisdom never will. You can put your full confidence in her. She will always do the best thing in every situation. You may lose your health, your money may disappear and your popularity may not last but if you have wisdom, you lack nothing of real value.
3. Her power to be a constant source of good and not harm (12)
She brings him good, not harm, all the days of her life (12). A person who has wisdom has a constant source of good. Wealth and fame are as likely to do you harm as good. Not even health and peace guarantee inevitable good.
Have you recognised how desirable wisdom is? It is your greatest need. But where to find it? It is clear from the Bible that true wisdom is found only in Jesus Christ who is God's Word and God's Wisdom. It is by trusting in him that we learn to be wise. Trust in him. Trust in him more and more.

2. Her quality
A number of characteristics of true wisdom come out here. If we have true wisdom, it will produce these same characteristics in us.
1. She is careful and caring
See verses 13, 14 and 27 She selects wool and flax and works with eager hands. She is like the merchant ships, bringing her food from afar ... She watches over the affairs of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness. Careful selection of wool and flax is necessary to provide ample supplies for her needlework so that the family can be fed. Food stuffs are needed to nourish them. Today the woman might be headed for the haberdashers and the supermarket but the point is the same – she selects. She does not stuff any old rubbish into the supermarket trolley. She looks at the labels. Wise people are careful people. They choose with care.
2. She is diligent and hard working
What a hive of activity there is here!
See especially verses verses 15-19
She gets up while it is still night; she provides food for her family and portions for her women servants. She considers a field and buys it; out of her earnings she plants a vineyard. She sets about her work vigorously; her arms are strong for her tasks. She sees that her trading is profitable, and her lamp does not go out at night. In her hand she holds the distaff and grasps the spindle with her fingers.
She is not only up early but she works late too, if necessary. She is enterprising. In 21st century Britain she may be dealing with household appliances and tradesmen rather than with women servants, and a little business run from home may be more likely than buying fields and planting vineyards, but the principles of diligence and hard work don't change. Wisdom does not fly to you. You must be up and about working at gaining it and employing it. The distaff and spindle have also been superseded by purchases at the department store or the charity shop but vigour and strength are still the way forward and there must be no idle moments. At the end of verse 27 it says she does not eat the bread of idleness. Nor does anyone who is wise or who hopes to be wise.
3. She is giving and loving
20, 21 She opens her arms to the poor and extends her hands to the needy. When it snows, she has no fear for her household; for all of them are clothed in scarlet. She works for the sake of her family, but not only her family – also for the poor and needy. Anyone who lacks generosity and love has not begun to understand wisdom.
4. She is attractive and creative
22 She makes coverings for her bed; she is clothed in fine linen and purple. There's nothing dowdy about this woman Wisdom. She has flair. She not only knows how to provide for people but there is something aesthetically pleasing about her whole approach.
I will never forget the first visit to our church of Michael Toogood who is retired now but who worked so faithfully some years ago planting a church in the notorious Soho area of Central London. Among the pictures he showed us were “before and after shots” of the first family home in a block of flats there in Soho. In the first exterior shot even a glance revealed the dirty and dilapidated state of the residence. But the next shot was a burst of colour as a clean, freshly painted flat shone out from behind beautiful hanging baskets and standing pots of pretty flowers. He and his wife had transformed the place!
It has been argued that the power and beauty of 17th century paintings of Dutch interiors derive from the renaissance of Calvinism in that part of the world at that time. Certainly, wherever Christian people have gone in the way of wisdom there has been an undoubted beauty in the artefacts they have produced. We may not all be artistically gifted, but where wisdom is at work then beauty will be found too.
5. She is valuable and honourable.
23 Her husband is respected at the city gate, where he takes his seat among the elders of the land. Inevitably wisdom brings both responsibility and honour. The city gate was where the elders met in ancient Israel and where judgements were made. If Wisdom is your wife you'll be given responsibility and while you remain true to her (to wisdom) you will be accepted and respected by all who love justice and fair play.
6. She is enterprising and outgoing
24 She makes linen garments and sells them, and supplies the merchants with sashes. We have already alluded to Wisdom's enterprising nature. Here she is seen not only providing for her family and for the needy but producing goods for sale at a profit both for her own retail and to supply others. Some take a narrow view and suppose that a woman's place is in the home and only in the home. That sounds more restrictive than the Bible. Wisdom certainly doesn't sit around waiting for things to happen. It sees where the demand is and supplies it. It is active in buying and selling. It is business-minded, commercial, enterprising, adventurous even.
7. She is dignified and assured
25 She is clothed with strength and dignity; she can laugh at the days to come. Wisdom gives a strength and dignity that cannot be bought. Some think physical exercise will secure their future. Others suppose the latest fashions will give them some sort of status. True wisdom recognises that dignity and assurance come from Christ. Only he can give us absolute confidence for both time and eternity.
8. Committed to teaching others
26 She speaks with wisdom, and faithful instruction is on her tongue. She is committed to teaching others. True wisdom always has an effect on others. Like the woman here who speaks wisely to others and faithfully teaches, so wisdom imparts its fruit to others. It may be in a formal setting such as Sunday School class; more often not. Chatting after church is often where a lot of good work is done. Whatever the circumstances, true wisdom finds ways to share its discoveries with others.
Which of these qualities are yours by God's grace? Where do you need to do the most work?

3. Her glory
In verses 28-31 there is a description of the rewards that the woman Wisdom receives. This brings home to us the glories of wisdom.
There are three things to notice in particular
1. She is gratefully praised by those nearest to her (28, 29)
Her children arise and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praises her: Many women do noble things, but you surpass them all. Those who have wisdom, who know Christ, will know gratefulness and glory, whether we think of it in terms of a husband's embraces or the praises of Wisdom’s children.
When you ask truly wise people the secret of their wisdom, they don’t say ‘Oh it’s me. I’m just like that’. No, they acknowledge that any wisdom they have is God given. They give the glory to Christ. Their highest praise is for him. Many have done noble things but the Lord Jesus surpasses them all. His alone is the pre-eminence.
Listen to this testimony from the wise. It is not wealth or fame or even good health or education that you need most but Christ.
2. She shows that charm is deceptive, beauty fleeting and the fear of the Lord pre-eminent (30)
30 Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting; but a woman who fears the LORD is to be praised. Charm can take you a long way in this world but it is deceptive. ‘Watch her - she’s a real charmer’ people say. Beauty, of course, does not last, however much help it receives from bottles, tubes and even plastic surgeons! But what does last is the fear of LORD - which, of course, is where wisdom begins.
In 1 Peter 3:3, 4 Peter is so bold as to give the women of the churches to which he writes some beauty tips. What does he recommend? Not outward adornment, such as elaborate hairstyles and the wearing of gold jewellery and fine clothes. By the way he's not banning elaborate hairstyles or gold jewellery or fine clothes he's just saying don't rely on these to look beautiful. Instead he says your beauty should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God's sight.
How are you seeking to make yourself beautiful?
3. She is the source of many great works for which she should be praised (31)
31 Honour her for all that her hands have done, and let her works bring her praise at the city gate. As with the neighbouring book of Ecclesiastes, Proverbs ends with a reference to the judgement. Here we are at the city gate, the place where Wisdom's voice is first heard in this book (1:21) and the place of judgement. And who is before the court, or perhaps better, whose name is on everyone's lips? The name of this woman. And so it will be on the final day of judgement itself. The name on everyone's lips then will be the name of Christ, God's wisdom, for then it will be realised that every good work ever done has been done through him.
Will your good deeds be on display on that day? It is only possible to have any truly good deeds through the Lord Jesus Christ, God’s wisdom. Therefore, look always and only to him. That is the message of these verses and of the whole Book of Proverbs and hopefully of this message too.

This paper was given at an EMW Conference for minister's wives in Bala

20220729

Benjamin Francis 1734-1799 Pastor, church planter, poet, man of God


Imagine you are a young theological student, not yet twenty, but with a call to the ministry and a great desire to study God's Word. The college is in a big and unfamiliar city to which you have travelled by water, commended to the tutors by your home church. No doubt with the expected apprehension, there would be great excitement as you began your studies. However, there is one snag. All the lectures are in a language that you are really not very familiar with. You do not know enough English, even to say grace at the meal table.
This was the situation that confronted the subject of our paper, Benjamin Francis, who grew up in a Wales that was then almost entirely Welsh speaking but who came to the academy in Bristol in 1753 intent on preparing himself for future ministry, chiefly by hearing lectures in English.
The Head of the institution at the time, Bernard Foskett (1685-1758), was not unfamiliar with this sort of situation. In the period 1720-1758, when he headed the work, half the Bristol students were Welshmen. In most cases Welsh would have been their first language and sometimes, initially, almost their only language. In Francis's case, Foskett was doubtful whether he was going to benefit from the course. Thankfully, from 1733, Foskett was assisted in his work by the man who would eventually succeed him, a Welshman called Hugh Evans (1712-1781). Evans pleaded Francis's case and soon the latter found himself not only able to express himself in English but able to do so with such great fluency that in a few years time the great John Gill (1697-1771) was recommending him as his successor.

*

The eighteenth century was a period when God greatly blessed these islands with revival and when there were some great Christian leaders in the land, men such as Whitefield and the Wesleys; John Cennick and John Newton; Isaac Watts, Philip Doddridge, Matthew Henry.
In Wales, there were Daniel Rowland, Howell Harris and William Williams and in Scotland, Ralph and Ebenezer Erskine, not forgtting New England, where Jonathan Edwards was a great force for good, having an impact both there in the new world and, through his writings, back here in the old one.
Among the Particular Baptists in England, there were stalwarts such as John Gill and Benjamin Beddome and later, Andrew Fuller, John Sutcliff and William Carey. I want to focus in this paper on one of those stalwarts, a lesser known one perhaps, but one well worthy of our attention. Benjamin Francis was born in 1734 and died in 1799. He was a long serving pastor, a church planter, a hymn writer, a poet and a man of God.

Earliest days
Benjamin was born in midsummer 1734 in a place called Pen-y-gelli, near Newcastle Emlyn, (where Dr D Martyn Lloyd-Jones 1899-1980 is buried). Francis was the second son and youngest child of Enoch and Mary Francis. Enoch Francis (1689-1740), from a family of ministers, was a minister of the gospel and a very well known and godly man. By the time Benjamin was six, both parents had died so he was brought up in Swansea, where he and his older brother Jonathan Francis (1722-1801) were baptised in 1749 by Griffith Davies. At the time Benjamin was only 15.
We are told that even in childhood he had began to be deeply impressed with a conviction of the great worth of his soul and the need to turn to Christ. When he was only seven years old, they say, he felt a continual reverence for God's great majesty, had a dread of associating with wicked companions and was full of contempt if he heard any profane or impure conversation. If he should hear such a thing, he would call it out. He had, at this early period, such a flow of affection sometimes in prayer, which he had begun to engage in from a young age, that, it is said, "his whole heart was overwhelmed with rapture."
By the time he was 19, he, like his father and brother, had begun to preach the Word, which he would go on to do for the rest of his life. His brother Jonathan had planned to study in Bristol but that did not happen, although it did for Benjamin. From 1747 Jonathan was already ministering at Penyfai, near Bridgend.

Bristol
Benjamin moved first from Swansea to Pontypool, presumably intending to study at the Trosnant Academy, and then to Bristol, thanks to the efforts of his minister, Griffith Davies. He arrived in Bristol in 1753, commended 'by letter from Swansey'. There he studied for the next three years or so.
As was stated, he had spoken only Welsh to this point and acquiring the English tongue did not come easy. There were plenty of Welshmen in Bristol, however. Fellow students include James Edwards of Llanwenarth, near Abergavenny; Thomas Lewis (1730-1774) of Penygarn, Pontypool, where his uncle ministered and Rees Jones (b c 1710) of Aberduar, Carmarthenshire. These three, like Francis, were supported by the trust set up by Robert Bodenham (d 1726) in 1716. Edwards, whose brother Morgan Edwards (1722-1792) went to Rhode Island, came to Bristol at the same time as Francis, while Lewis and Jones came the following year. Lewis went on to Tiverton, then Exeter; Jones, already 43 when he began, had probably ministered at home and in Bassaleg near Newport beforehand. There was also Morgan Jones (d c 1797) son of Griffith Jones of Penyfai, Hengoed and later America who came in 1755 and Charles Harris (c 1720-1779) Penygarn who arrived as Francis left. Jones became assistant in Pershore in 1756 and served in Hemel Hempstead, 1761-1778, later keeping an academy. Harris, previously at the Trosnant academy, was drawn to Arminianism and in 1757 followed a man of that persuasion in Bridgwater, Somerset.
There were also James Poulson (b c 1731) who started the year before Francis from Tewkesbury. They excommunicated him in 1757 "for lying and acts of great injustice" but, thankfully, he was restored in October 1769 and dismissed to the London church of Andrew Gifford (1700-1784). There were also two Devonians, Samuel Burford (c 1725-1768) of Upottery, near Honiton and James Larwill (c 1722-1786) of Bampton, near Tiverton. Burford was there about 1753-1755. Another Bodenham man, he went to Lyme Regis in 1749, then Little Prescott Street, Goodman Fields, London, also pastoring a Seventh Day Baptist Congregation. Larwill had two brothers in the ministry, He started around 1755 and, in 1759, went to Limehouse, London; Wantage in 1767 and was in Lyme Regis, 1780-1784.

Horsley
Formally called by the church in Swansea in 1755, at the end of his studies in Bristol, Francis preached for a while in Chipping Sodbury, Gloucestershire, but was then called to Horsley, still in Gloucestershire but further north near Nailsworth, in 1757. There he remained through a happy and very successful ministry of 42 years, until his death.
At his ordination on October 12, 1758, Hugh Evans preached to the church, from 1 Thessalonians 2:19 and John Tommas (1723-1800), also of Bristol, gave the charge, from Colossians 4:17. Also present were fellow Welshman Thomas Davis of Fairford (c 1724-1784) and previous pastor Samuel Bowen (c 1727-1764), who had gone on to Wantage.
At the time when Francis arrived, the church had only 66 members, and such was their poverty, that they could only pay him £20 per annum (under £4000 in today's terms). Though the stipend was smaller than at Chipping Sodbury, he felt God's call to Horsley and it was there that he went to pastor a poor congregation in a remote place. However discouraging the prospect as to externals, young Francis prepared himself for action and, putting his trust in the Lord, laboured indefatigably in his Master's work. By God's blessing, he saw 13 people added to the church in his first year and numbers continued to grow so that by 1760 it was necessary to enlarge the place of worship - not the last time that this would happen. The Horsley congregation continued to grow and in 1764 they added a vestry to the meeting house.

Invitations to London
In this early period, and again at later points, there were pressing invitations to settle in London, first from the church in Devonshire Square, then from the church in Carter Lane, Southwark, both before and after the death of their pastor John Gill. Many respected ministers united in urging Francis to comply with the request from Gill's church. However, his attachment to the friends at Horsley was so great that the please from London left him unmoved. The Horsley folk were full of affection for him and were so glad that he stayed. His continued success and the many open doors of usefulness that existed in Gloucestershire further combined to strengthen his resolve to stay.
Within two years, there was a further addition of 31 members, and 40 more in the next two years.

Minchin Hampton
Meanwhile, in 1765, Francis had a building erected in Minchin Hampton, about three miles from Horsley, where some of his members lived, and where there was a genuine need for a work. He kept up a lecture there once a fortnight for the next 35 years. He persisted unwearily for the good of the people of the place, despite an apparent lack of success. Indeed, it appears to have been one of his most unsuccessful endeavours in terms of numbers.
It was a notorious place. When George Whitefield (1714-1770) preached there, they had been violent towards him and nothing had much changed when Francis began preaching there 21 years later. In Whitefield's time they had attacked his fellow preacher, Thomas Adams (d 1770)m a gentleman, dragging him through the town and throwing him into the brook.
Francis persisted there with next to no success. However, subsequent to his death, things changed and a church was finally formed.
Besides the church in Minchinhampton, where he preached over 800 times, he also planted churches in the Gloucestershire villages of Avening, Nympsfield and Uley, although these latter ones did not long survive.

Horsley growth
Meanwhile, at Horsley, and in the immediate neighbourhood, there was success. Between 1771 and 1773 God added to the church 54 more members so that in 1774, the meeting-house required a second enlargement, which was accomplished at the expense of £500 (c £80,000 today).
During his ministry, it seems he baptised 450 people altogether. Some 42 of these came under church discipline and were removed but by the time of his death church membership stood at 262.
And so in what had at first seemed an unpromising situation, Francis was able, by God's blessing, to gather a very large congregation. It is said that people flocked in from more than 15 different parishes. As one writer describes it, on the Lord's Day one would see, "on the rising ground above the meeting-house, one group after another ... emerging from the woods; some of them having come from the distance of 10 miles, and upwards".

Endeavours elsewhere
One of the features of Francis's long ministry was his heroic endeavours away from Horsley. His efforts were quite remarkable. He was often the first one to introduce evangelical religion to the many spiritually benighted towns and villages of Gloucestershire and beyond. For many years he made excursions every month into the neglected parts of Gloucestershire and neighbouring Worcestershire and Wiltshire. He not only visited believers and strengthened their hands but sought to sow the gospel seed in pastures new.
In the course of his journeys through Worcestershire, which he regularly made from about 1772 until 1784, it appears that he preached in many places, including Pershore, 137 times and Upton-upon-Severn, 180 times. His son-in-law provides many specific numbers of that sort, including, in Gloucestershire - Cheltenham, 130 sermons; Tewkesbury, 136; Uley, five miles from Horsley, 350 and Meysey Hampton, near Cirencester, 803 sermons.
His pattern was to set out from home on a Monday morning and return on a Friday evening, after having taken a circuit of 90 miles or more, preaching somewhere every evening.
At Malmesbury, Wiltshire, he also established a monthly lecture, where, from 1771-1799, he preached 282 sermons. He also preached, in Wiltshire, in Christian Malford, near Chippenham, 84 times; Devizes, 56 times and 90 times each in Melksham, Trowbridge and Bradford on Avon.
On his visits to Bristol, he preached 101 times at Broadmead and 28 times at the Pithay. He preached too in Portsmouth 22 times and an equal number at Plymouth and Plymouth Dock. He preached in Frome, Somersetshire, 90 times.
He went down to Cornwall at least twenty times and saw many converted there. He was often involved in baptising converts. On one occasion when he was baptising people at Penzance on his first journey into Cornwall, he was interrupted by some scoundrels, to whom he addressed himself so affectionately and impressively that they were struck with deep conviction of sin, and on his next visit he had the pleasure of baptising them in the name of the Lord Jesus, on a profession of their faith in him.
He frequently visited Wales, and was often at annual associations, preaching at least 14 times. Altogether he preached in Wales, both in Welsh and English, about 150 sermons. In 1791, he visited Ireland, and preached, chiefly in Dublin, 30 times. Whenever he visited London, there were plenty of opportunities to preach. He preached too in various other places.
Whenever he preached, it is said, he was evidently concerned to declare the whole counsel of God and to be pure from the blood of all men. At home, or away, he was careful not to handle God's Word deceitfully but sought always to display the truth, commending himself to everyone's conscience in God's sight. No matter where he preached he always preached the same gospel, never seeking to disguise his sentiments or to soft pedal certain fashionable sins in order to win favour.
In Horsley, church discipline was exercised firmly but tenderly. His compassion for sinners could sometimes provoke him to tears, when he was preaching. The proof that this was not for mere show was in the way at times he helped those in need from his own pocket. He was also able at times to prompt his wealthier acquaintance to do something for his poor neighbours, especially believers. More than £300 (something like £35,000 in today's terms) was passed on by him to the poor in his congregation in this way.

Method of self-examination
It appears that Francis adopted a method, which he probably took from the New England Puritan Cotton Mather (1663-1728), of proposing questions to himself every morning of the week, to assist him in the best method of doing good in all his connections. These were the questions

Lord's Day morning. What can I do more for God, in the promotion of religion, in the church over which I am pastor?
Monday. What can I do for my family, as a husband, a father, or a master?
Tuesday. What good can I do for my relations abroad?
Wednesday. What good can I do in the societies of which I am a member?
Thursday. What good shall I do for the churches of Christ at large?
Friday. What special subjects of affliction, and objects of pity, may I take under my particular care? and what shall I do for them?
Saturday. What more have I to do for the interest of God in my own heart and life?

Family life
Francis was twice married. His first wife, whom he married in 1757 around the time of his call to Horsley, was born with the surname Harris, and like him was a native of Wales. By her he had several children but all of them were soon taken by death, except the second, a daughter named Mary, who lived to be 31. She died nearly ten years before her father, leaving a motherless family of five children behind. His first-born, named Enoch, died when just 18 months old.
This was a painful stroke but in 1765, he met with a series of bereavements unusual even for those times and rarely the lot of anyone. Under these trials he would have sunk, no doubt, had he not known what it is to be in the hands of the one whose strength is made perfect in weakness and had he not realised that underneath are the everlasting arms. The wife of his youth was removed first, on April 26; then on June 18, his son Benjamin, 4; next his youngest daughter, Sarah, died, July 4, and his daughter Elizabeth, 3, July 10. These distressing events made him leave his former home for a period, such a reminder was it of sadness. He published a plaintive elegy at this time that movingly describes the anguish of his wounded spirit and the relief he found in God's compassion and the prospect of future bliss.
On July 27, 1766, he married again, this time to a Miss Wallis, who would outlive him. By her he had another ten children, but only three survived him. The first, by this second marriage, was again called Enoch but the child did not live long enough to emulate his grandfather. Born profoundly deaf and so unable to speak, he was very much loved by his parents but died when he was only 15. Prior to that he had shown himself to be very intelligent and able to gather knowledge despite his handicap. He also professed faith, rigidly shunning the company of bad companions and delighting to be in church. During his final short illness, he seems to have been strangely aware of his approaching death.
A daughter, Esther, and two sons, died young. An account of a second Esther appeared in the Baptist Register (Vol I p 159). She died August 25, 1790, aged 11. She gave good evidence of being saved. It was similar with the death of her older sister, who died in the same year, at the age of 16, after a lingering illness, marked by unusual marks of grace. A son, named Benjamin, was spared for 27 years. He went to America, where his temporal prospects looked good. He was on the point of marrying when, in 1795, he was cut off in his prime by yellow fever. This was in Petersburgh, Norfolk, South Carolina. What a terrible blow. A touching letter from Francis to his son's intended has been preserved and is worth quoting. In the letter he says
Though overwhelmed with grief at the loss of a dear and affectionate son, whom 1 tenderly loved, yet I dare not repine at the disposal of unerring Providence, but am enabled to say, The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away, blessed be the name of the Lord. Christ is altogether worthy of your entire confidence, chief esteem and everlasting adoration. May this bitter cup be abundantly mixed with divine consolations; and while you lament the loss of the uncertain stream of temporal felicity, may you drink eternal happiness at the fountain head."

Elegies and other poetical works
Francis composed and printed several elegies. These include elegies for well known figures such as Whitefield and the Baptists John Gill, Caleb Evans (1737-1791), son of Hugh, and Samuel Pearce (1766-1799). The one for Pearce, remarkably, was composed on his own death bed. Others were for lesser known figures including Robert Day (1721-1791), Williams of Cardigan (1732-1799), &c. Some of the elegies were in Welsh. He wrote many other poems too. The most famous The Conflagration, a Poem in Four Parts was published in 1770. He also wrote in 1790 The Association, celebrating the association meetings that were so much part of Baptist life at this time. Another interesting work was A Poetical Address to the Stockbridge Indians among whom Jonathan Edwards worked.
In his later years, he would often weep when remembering friends such as Joshua Thomas (1719-1787) of Leominster, for whom he also wrote an elegy and with whom he corresponded for many years, sending questions to each other, and Daniel Turner (1710-1798) of Abingdon and others. Looking up to heaven, Francis would refer to it as the residence of his most numerous friends, containing far more of them than death had left him to enjoy on earth.

Hymns
Francis also wrote hymns, five of which appeared in Rippon's Selection of 1787. These include

Before Thy throne, eternal King - for meetings of ministers or church conferences
Glory to the eternal King - on the majesty of God
In sweet [or loud] exalted strains for the opening of a place of worship

This last one was first sung at the opening of the meeting house at Horsley, September 18, 1774 and at the opening of a new meeting house at Downend, near Bristol, in 1786. It was later altered to begin Come, King of glory, come. Spurgeon then altered it again to begin Great King of Zion, now.
There was also Praise the Saviour, all ye nations for taking up the offering. With my substance I will honour is a cento from this hymn. On death he wrote Ye objects of sense and enjoyments of time. It originally had 16 stanzas.
He was in particular a writer of Welsh hymns. In 1774 he published Alleluia, neu Hymnau perthynol i Addoliad Cyhoeddus (Hallelujah or Hymns pertaining to Public Worship). To this he contributed 103 hymns. A second volume appeared in 1786, to which he contributed 91 hymns, being a total of 194 in all. Of these many appear still to be in use.
As a hymn writer, he is criticised for over use of alliteration and internal rhyme.

Preaching
John Ryland (1753-1825) reckoned that Francis and the silver tongued Samuel Pearce were the best preachers he knew. He once wrote, beginning with Pearce, that
Much as that seraphic young man was esteemed by many, I know not that anyone thought more highly of him than myself. I was used to think that Benjamin Francis, as an aged man, and Samuel Pearce, as a young man, were the two most popular preachers I had personally known, who, without rising to sublime eloquence, owed no part of their popularity to eccentricity. A peculiar fluency of delivery, and a most serious and affectionate address, would have made them acceptable to all classes of hearers, in any part of the kingdom.
For some reason, none of Francis's sermons were preserved. We can get an idea of his preaching perhaps, Michael Haykin suggests, through his association letters. He was author of the letters for the Western Association five times - 1765, 1772, 1778, 1782 and 1796. Haykin says that in these letters Francis touches on a number of themes including the challenges of poverty and affluence, the danger of dead orthodoxy and the nature of genuine faith. He presses home the need for a Christianity in which the heart is vitally engaged and treats of the various disciplines of the Christian life. He seeks to nurture a concern for unity in the churches. However, says Haykin,
... there is one theme that comes up again and again: the beauty of Christ and the passion that should be ours in serving him. In the final analysis, it was this passion for Christ and his glory that underlay all the evangelistic and pastoral labours of Benjamin Francis ...
The circular letter of 1772, for example, addresses those ‘who are sickly and feeble in the spiritual life’ and who have become ‘almost strangers to closet devotion, deep contrition for sin, earnest wrestling with the Lord in prayer, heavenly affections, and sensible communion with God’.
He encourages them to ask themselves these sobering questions: ‘Will you call this the religion of Jesus? Is this the fruit of his love and crucifixion?’ Without a ‘living faith in Jesus Christ’, Francis reminds his readers, ‘our orthodox notions’, church attendance and outward morality will ultimately avail for nothing.
And so he urges the need for ‘a spiritual sight of the awful perfections of God, of the adorable glories of Christ, and of the ineffable excellency of divine and eternal things’.
They also need to beware of resting their salvation on their performance as Christians and their faithful attendance on ordinances. ‘Constantly rest in Christ alone’, says Francis.
He encourages his readers to ‘look for every blessing … in and through [Christ,] the infinitely prevalent Mediator’. Building on this, he urges his readers to ‘live daily on Christ as your spiritual food, and seek hourly communion with him as the beloved of your souls’.
In 1778 he is mainly concerned with the nature of genuine faith and has a similar emphasis. In a section that deals with the difference between assurance and faith, he exhorts
Place then your entire confidence in Christ for the whole of salvation: let the declarations and promises of the gospel be your only warrant for believing in him: and consider your purest principles, happiest frames, and holiest duties, not as the foundation, but the superstructure of faith.
Let not your sweetest experiences, which are at best but shallow cisterns, but Christ alone, be the source of your comfort, and constantly live upon that inexhaustible fountain.
Christ alone is the source of salvation and he alone gives the strength to live the Christian life. The final sentence alludes to Jeremiah 2:13. There, the Lord rebukes his people for forsaking him, ‘the fountain of living waters’, and living instead on the water drawn from ‘broken cisterns’ of their own devising.
Inspired, no doubt, by such New Testament passages as John 4:10-13 and 7:37, where Christ states that he is the source of ‘living water’ that quenches spiritual thirst, Francis identifies the ‘fountain’ of Jeremiah 2 as Christ.

Latter years
God made his final years God honouring and useful to a high degree. Large numbers continued to join the church. He had the pleasure of baptising, along with others, his own daughters. The congregation so multiplied that near the end of his life a third enlargement of the place of worship was necessary. In the end he did not live to see the day appointed for its opening. The day Dr John Ryland was due to preach for the opening, he was called away to preach at the funeral of Samuel Pearce, at Birmingham. By the time he was able to come back to Horsely, Francis was dead and so he preached the good man's funeral sermon.

Last illness
In Francis's time, Christians often liked to make a great deal of the way their heroes died. Francis's biographers did not find his mindset during his last illness particularly remarkable. However, he seems to have had an even spirit and some strong consolations. One morning, it is said, his Welsh Bible was put into his hand and he read Psalm 23. When he came to the last verse Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever, he was full of thanksgiving for God's grace towards him. Fondly embracing his Bible, he laid it by his side, as if he did not want to let it out of his sight as he contemplated facing the final enemy, death, and his passage to another world.
On the evening of the Lord's Day, December 1, 1799, growing worse and aware that this might be his last Lord's Day on earth, he expressed his wish to see his church officers one last time. When they arrived, he felt such strong emotions that he could not speak for a while. Recovering himself a little, he urged them to watch over the welfare of the church with the tenderest sympathy and to promote its welfare as best they could. He warned against worldliness and urged them not to lose their zeal but to lay themselves out for the benefit of the whole community, making love to Zion their chief aim. He spoke many other words of an evangelical flavour, including these words
O! cling to the cross, to the cross, to the cross! Here learn all you want to know; hence derive all you wish to possess; and by this, accomplish all you can desire to perform.
He then took each man by the hand, summing up his prayer in Paul's words from Acts 10:32, And now, brethren, I commend you to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up, and to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified.
By December 12 he did not have long. He held out a hand to each of his family and said
Come, as we must part, we had better now take our mutual farewell, and then you shall withdraw, that I may languish softly into life.
At this time, he would frequently repeat these lines, "Sweet truth to me, I shall arise, And with these eyes my Saviour see."
Death finally came on Saturday, December 14. At about 2 pm he quietly spoke of his inward peace. A relative whispered in his ear Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil. He replied, "No, no," adding, for thou art with me, thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. Despite lingering pain, he seemed to die happily, retaining the smile that through his life had made his face shine. At 8.15 pm he finally fell asleep in Jesus.
On Friday, December 20, 1799. his remains were interred in the meeting burying ground in a place he had chosen beforehand. He was 66. Ryland preached at the graveside and on the following Lord's day preached a funeral discourse from 1 Thessalonians 4:17, 18, So shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words. The sermon was printed and includes these words
The church of Christ, which worships statedly in this place, has been blessed, for above forty years, with one of the best pastors that could preside over a Christian society. Alas! that very day two months, that I, and many now present, attended your venerable pastor to his grave, I was preaching the funeral sermon for brother Pearce, of Birmingham, cut off in the midst of his years at 33. Now they are both gone! We have lost the most active, diligent, humble, spiritual, zealous, successful ministers, within about eight weeks of each other. You cannot but mourn, and all our churches mourn with you. This neighbourhood, especially, for a wide extent, has suffered a great loss. No more shall that man of God, whose soul glowed with such tender concern for the salvation of souls, take his circuit round the country, to publish the glad tidings to perishing sinners. I hope God has not said of all who stopped their ears to his charming voice, 'They are joined to idols, let them alone. He that continued impenitent under the awakening ministry of my servant FRANCIS, let him be given up to hardness of heart for ever!